<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Philip Olson lives here</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.roshambo.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.roshambo.org</link>
	<description>random thoughts at random times</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 06:29:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>One way PHP may capitalize on its popularity</title>
		<link>http://blog.roshambo.org/one-way-php-may-capitalize-on-its-popularity/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.roshambo.org/one-way-php-may-capitalize-on-its-popularity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 02:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[php]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.roshambo.org/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Rasmus mentioned that he received a $500 offer for the php.net domain name. Discussion ensued, which ultimately led to the indisputable belief that php.net is worth over 10 million US dollars. Therefore, let&#8217;s think about this further: Languages by worth [1] (in USD): php.net : $10,176,050 python.org : $4,088,792 perl.org : $246,064 ruby-lang.org : [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Today <a href="http://twitter.com/rasmus">Rasmus</a> mentioned that he received a <b>$500 offer</b> for the php.net domain name. Discussion ensued, which ultimately led to the indisputable belief that php.net is worth over 10 million US dollars. Therefore, let&#8217;s think about this further:
</p>
<h3>Languages by worth [1] (in USD):</h3>
<ul>
<li>php.net       : $10,176,050</li>
<li>python.org    : $4,088,792</li>
<li>perl.org      : $246,064</li>
<li>ruby-lang.org : $219,624</li>
</ul>
<p>
Clearly PHP is <b>#1</b>. And PHP should sell this domain name and purchase the competitors, so here&#8217;s how that proposal works:
</p>
<h3>First, purchase the competitor domain names:</h3>
<blockquote><p>
  10,176,050 &#8211; (4,088,792 + 246,064 + 219,624) = 5,621,570
</p></blockquote>
<h3>Next, purchase php.org for future use:</h3>
<blockquote><p>
  5,621,570  &#8211; 2,594 = 5,618,976
</p></blockquote>
<h3>And lastly, distribute the remaining cash to the php.net account holders</h3>
<blockquote><p>
  5,618,976 / 1,568 = $3,583.53 checks for everyone
</p></blockquote>
<p>
So if you want to be a part of this action, then be sure to apply for a SVN account within the next week. Here&#8217;s one way to do that:
</p>
<ul>
<li>Go to <a href="https://edit.php.net/">https://edit.php.net/</a></li>
<li>Or, use the [edit] links on the top right of every <a href="http://php.net/manual/">PHP manual page</a>, and click them</li>
<li>Create a patch or three</li>
<li>Email <a href="mailto:phpdoc@lists.php.net">phpdoc@lists.php.net</a> about these patches/changes, and <a href="https://wiki.php.net/doc/howto/gettingstarted">introduce yourself</a></li>
<li>Receive a php.net account (and your very own @php.net (soon to be @php.org!) email address) and start committing</li>
<li>And now wait for a large fat sack of cash in the mail, in the form of a check (signed by <a href="http://twitter.com/rasmus">Rasmus</a>, our <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benevolent_Dictator_For_Life">BDFL</a>)</li>
</ul>
<p>
How have we not done this already?!
</p>
<p>
And PHP is determining how best to take advantage of the haystack/needle confusion, but the increased site traffic from confused users can and should be taken advantage of. See, this was part of the master plan all along!
</p>
<p>
Solid reference: [1] <a href="http://domainvalues.com/">http://domainvalues.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.roshambo.org/one-way-php-may-capitalize-on-its-popularity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Write more Philip, use your words</title>
		<link>http://blog.roshambo.org/write-more-philip-use-your-words/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.roshambo.org/write-more-philip-use-your-words/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[phil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.roshambo.org/?p=229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you probably notice, this blog appears abandoned. I&#8217;m not sure why because I do love writing, but maybe micro-blogging is to blame. Writing short snippets on facebook/twitter has taken over but I&#8217;m sure others have written about this so I&#8217;ll stop rambling. I do plan to write more and this entry serves as is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you probably notice, this blog appears abandoned. I&#8217;m not sure why because I do love writing, but maybe micro-blogging is to blame. Writing short snippets on facebook/twitter has taken over but I&#8217;m sure others have written about this so I&#8217;ll stop rambling. I do plan to write more and this entry serves as is a reminder for myself to make this happen. </p>
<p>Also, I recently lived on a farm for a few months and enjoyed the experience. I&#8217;m in great shape. Being active is good for the soul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.roshambo.org/write-more-philip-use-your-words/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to manage and play fantasy sports (football)</title>
		<link>http://blog.roshambo.org/how-to-manage-and-play-fantasy-sports-football/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.roshambo.org/how-to-manage-and-play-fantasy-sports-football/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 18:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fantasy Football]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.roshambo.org/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the last couple years I&#8217;ve introduced a few friends to fantasy football. And rather than teach them how to play, they were thrown into the fire and have typically burned. But, we&#8217;ve all been there. I remember in 2004 that we all drafted kickers in the middle rounds, and defenses, but over time we&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Over the last couple years I&#8217;ve introduced a few friends to fantasy football. And rather than teach them how to play, they were thrown into the fire and have typically burned. But, we&#8217;ve all been there. I remember in 2004 that we all drafted kickers in the middle rounds, and defenses, but over time we&#8217;ve learned.
</p>
<p>
Here are some tips to newcomers (newbies), and tips that are based on watching my friends progress.
</p>
<h2>Do not drop top draft picks early, even after poor performances</h2>
<p>
Last year a friend dropped his #1 pick Michael Turner after week #3. This caused a lot of discussion and poking fun but it&#8217;s understandable too. Nobody wants poor performers on their teams, but we all have our bad days/weeks. Players are drafted early for a reason, so store them on your bench instead of dropping. Give them time to find themselves.
</p>
<p>
This year a friend dropped his top three wide receivers, including Brandon Marshall and DeSean Jackson. They didn&#8217;t have stellar first weeks but as stated above, not everyone does. And this especially applies to wide receivers, who aren&#8217;t as consistent as running backs.
</p>
<p>
And there are several places that list who you should own, with one being the &#8220;<a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/fantasy/nfl/news?slug=bf-bigboard-football">Big Board</a>&#8221; at Yahoo. It lists the top 100 players to own, so ideally the majority of your team is on this list. However, keep in mind that this is only one guys opinion.
</p>
<p>
Summary: Don&#8217;t panic.
</p>
<p></p>
<h2>If you&#8217;re unsure, use crowd wisdom to decide</h2>
<p><span id="more-167"></span></p>
<p>
We use Yahoo. It lists statistics like &#8220;<strong>projected rankings</strong>&#8221; and &#8220;<strong>% owned</strong>&#8221; which are key. Yahoo fantasy gurus determine what players are projected for over the course of the season. So while they aren&#8217;t perfect, it&#8217;s a decent baseline to use. Percent owned uses crowd wisdom which means if a player is 90-100% owned then there&#8217;s a good reason. Granted this doesn&#8217;t apply well to &#8220;new guys&#8221; but it&#8217;s still a worthwhile piece of information. Never drop near 100% owned players (unless they died).
</p>
<p></p>
<h2>Let experts help determine who to start each week</h2>
<p>
A lot of sites offer weekly projections to determine who will be the top performers for the upcoming week. All sites that manage fantasy leagues (like Yahoo) offer this next to your players, but plenty of sites are dedicated to this too. Here are a few:
</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://rotoworld.com/">Rotoworld</a> &#8211; They post their rankings every Thursday with an update on Saturday. The series is called &#8220;Goal Line Stand&#8221; and does a great job.</li>
<li><a href="http://games.espn.go.com/frontpage/football">ESPN</a> &#8211; They post their rankings on Wednesday and update them throughout the week, and offer several peoples rankings.</li>
<li><a href="http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com/">Yahoo</a> &#8211; Updated on Thursday, and offer several peoples rankings.</li>
</ul>
<p></p>
<h2>Waivers, free agents, and bench management</h2>
<p>
Not everyone is on a team, and throughout the season you will pickup and drop players. There are two distinct types and although each league manages waivers differently, they all have the same basic idea:
</p>
<ul>
<li>Waivers cannot be immediately picked up. It&#8217;s a period of time when each team has opportunity to pick up players by placing a waiver claim. If multiple teams place a waiver claim on one player, then the &#8220;who gets them&#8221; is determined by a ranked waiver priority system.  And once you use a waiver, then your priority resets to last. For example, in a ten team league each team has priority of 1 through 10. When #1 uses a waiver, they are rest to #10 and then 2-10 all bump up to 1-9. This applies to all positions. One strategy is to save waiver claims so that you eventually become #1 and can pickup anybody you want, when you want them. In this case you only pickup free agents until that happens.</li>
<li>Free agents are players that &#8220;cleared waivers&#8221; meaning nobody put in a waiver claim. Most players fall in this category, and these players can be added at any time. They cost nothing. Simply drop a player and pick up a free agent.</li>
<li>Some leagues have a FAAB (Free Agent Acquisition Budget) which is the same as waivers except instead of a prioritized number (1-10) you have a specified budget to use throughout the year. This will likely be common as time progresses. It&#8217;s a silent auction meaning you place a bid and hope for the best (that you &#8220;won&#8221;).</li>
<li>Your bench are full of backup players that you may play if the matchup is right (e.g., they face the Rams), or if a starter gets injured, or are players to use during bye weeks, and/or players that you&#8217;re giving time to see if they&#8217;ll eventually be good.</li>
</ul>
<p>
Typically you&#8217;ll drop bench players for waivers/free agents, and instead move &#8220;lame&#8221; starters to the bench. Also, dropping a player puts them on waivers. And in many leagues, all players go on waivers from Sunday-Tuesday, then become free agents on Wednesday.
</p>
<p></p>
<h2>Drafting</h2>
<p>
This is a different topic and has already concluded in the league in question. But I recommend getting good/elite WRs, and drafting a kicker/defense in the last two rounds. And have only one TE.
</p>
<h2>Summary</h2>
<p>Good luck! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.roshambo.org/how-to-manage-and-play-fantasy-sports-football/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>blog software update</title>
		<link>http://blog.roshambo.org/blog-software-update/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.roshambo.org/blog-software-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[phil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.roshambo.org/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m in the midst of moving blog software. Some things appear broken. I hope this problem does not continue. Haven&#8217;t yet touched the theme, I think the font is too small. My eyes hurt reading this blog. PHP Planet Note: I see PHP Planet has added all of my PHP posts, yet the pubDate remains [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in the midst of moving blog software. Some things appear broken. I hope this problem does not continue. Haven&#8217;t yet touched the theme, I think the font is too small. My eyes hurt reading this blog.</p>
<p><strong>PHP Planet Note:</strong> I see PHP Planet has added all of my PHP posts, yet the pubDate remains the same (old) so I&#8217;m unsure why it&#8217;s doing that. The URLs did change however. Investigating&#8230;. <strong>FAIL</strong>.</p>
<p>Update: Wrote the planet. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.roshambo.org/blog-software-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>paul graham wrote an essay about stuff</title>
		<link>http://blog.roshambo.org/paul-graham-wrote-an-essay-about-stuff/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.roshambo.org/paul-graham-wrote-an-essay-about-stuff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.roshambo.org/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Graham has slowly become my hero. Or at least, I think he&#8217;s interesting and wise. The essay linked here is about stuff, and it touches on how the amount of stuff we [humans] collect has changed over time. It also talks about the value of stuff, and even eludes to the fact that stuff [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Graham">Paul Graham</a> has slowly become my hero. Or at least, I think he&#8217;s interesting and wise. The essay linked here is about <a href="http://paulgraham.com/stuff.html">stuff</a>, and it touches on how the amount of stuff we [humans] collect has changed over time. It also talks about the value of stuff, and even eludes to the fact that stuff can own us. He explains it much better than I so have a read:</p>
<p><a href="http://paulgraham.com/stuff.html">http://paulgraham.com/stuff.html</a></p>
<p>Warning: It contains a lot of words, and no pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.roshambo.org/paul-graham-wrote-an-essay-about-stuff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

